|   Already Have an Account? - Sign In   |   Help
Bill Gates Wants Depopulation Through Vaccines and Health Care
(266213 views) Uploaded 9/27/2010 4:47:32 PM by University   (191 videos)   |  Learn more at: http://www.naturalhealth365.com

Info Comments (32)  

Video Information

"The world today has 6.8 billion people. That's heading up to about nine billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent!" (About 1 Billion People!)

Learn more at: http://www.naturalhealth365.com

Video Keywords: big pharma    vaccines    fda    cdc    health freedom    politics        healthcare    vaccination    vaccine    bill gates   

Rate This Video:  5 ratings


You must be signed in to use this feature.
Once you're signed in you'll be able to email videos to people, post comments, upload your own videos and much more.


Share this video on your site or blog. Just copy & paste one of the following:
Embeded Video Player (640x360):
Embeded Video Player (480x270):
Embeded Video Player (320x180):
Thumbnail Image Link:
Text Link:
Is there something wrong with this video or viewer comment? Please let us know:
Please describe the issue:
We would really appreciate you entering your email address so we can
response to you, but it is not required

Captcha Code:
Please enter the code displayed below

Viewer Comments (32 total)

You must be signed in to post comments.
Once you're signed in you'll be able to email videos to people, post comments, upload your own videos and much more.


Posted 7/1/2015 2:41:40 PM
What does Bill Gates mean when he says that we can "reduce" world population through vaccines, healthcare, and reproductive health services? So, this is a failure of communication on Mr. Gates' part. He's falling into the trap of assuming that you are familiar with things that he is intimately familiar with. In a nutshell, Mr. Gates thinks that vaccines and better healthcare have the net effect of reducing population growth because people have fewer children when they expect them to survive. This is supported by data linking increasing health with a decrease in birth rate. The most dramatic demonstration of this is in many European countries where standard of living is high and population growth has dropped below what is necessary to maintain the population. So by increasing worldwide health using vaccination and healthcare we can in the long term decrease population growth. Increased access to reproductive health care can also facilitate this. It's critical to note that Mr. G
Posted 5/17/2015 11:30:17 PM
Much as I disapprove of most of what the Gates Foundation does (promoting GMOs, fluoridation, vaccines, etc.), there is a reasonable and benign explanation for Bill’s comments. (I realize that many of us in the SlowAndNoVax movement consider Climate Change to be a hoax. However, in the process of getting my Environmental Studies bachelor’s degree, I read enough to conclude that humans have indeed added so much CO2 to the atmosphere that we actually are a big part of the rising average temperature. Of course, there are other factors that don’t get much coverage, such as Milankovitch cycles.) Humanity’s use of fossil fuels is a big reason why the earth’s average temperature is headed to levels only reached naturally 55 million years ago. This human-caused temp increase will cause an even larger nature-caused rise as vast amounts of methane is released into the atmosphere due to higher temps in polar oceans that melt the methane stored there in solid form for millions of years.
Posted 8/9/2014 10:36:07 PM
This video is like 3 minutes. The Ted Talks he gave was a little over 27 minutes. I think people are taking this out of context. When he mentions the whole thing about vaccines, and healthcare the idea is to reduce the population growth. By eliminating vaccines, we would be decreasing the population growth by the spread of disease that should have been a non-factor. Furthermore, to put this into context, or the rest of the 23 minutes his main point is that we need to use alternate energy, such as the new cool up to date nuclear plant technology, so everyone would benefit from the energy. Please watch the whole video, go to Ted Talks not some abridged version that takes away the meaning.
Posted 8/8/2014 2:37:04 AM
people... he's not saying "let's kill a billion people". He's saying, "if we have better education and better health care, then instead of a future with 9 billion people crowding the planet (because poor, uneducated people have LOTS of babies to make up for the few that die young) we could have a planet with less than 8 billion people." (not by killing a billion, but by making it so parents can keep one baby alive through to adulthood instead of trying to make 8 or more babies.) one of the other commenters raised an intelligent point though.... yes, people services produce X carbon per person, but the countries with the most poor people are not going to reduce the CO2 by much, even if they have a billion fewer kids, because they are already not the people using the most CO2 intensive stuff... anyway, mainly I wanted to correct your misunderstanding about the "10% fewer people". Actually we are ALREADY moving toward better education that will lower the world population... it's go
Posted 3/3/2014 6:34:08 PM
my neighbor's step-sister brought home $20864 a week ago. she has been making cash on the internet and bought a $519900 home. All she did was get lucky and apply the advice exposed on this link >>>>JUMP26.COM
Posted 1/19/2014 6:05:19 PM
@lankinkreif . Before you call other people 'morons' please take your little tunel vision, turn it towards wikipedia , enter DEPOPULATION. Please do yourself a fawour and read it from top to botom sincerely. . Secondly listen to the whole version of the speach . I hope it helps , best of luck :)
Posted 10/1/2013 11:46:24 AM
for any of you who are saying he is talking about c02 rather than population.. you are a moron... he clearly has the P highlighted and is explaining how by vaccines, health care, reproductive health services that we can reduce that number (p) by 15%.
Posted 5/13/2013 10:15:56 AM
The best 'constraint' would be for Bill Gates and his entire family to vaccinate themselves and zero themselves from the population. Less corporations destroying the environment would enable more CO2 absorbing trees to take over destroyed farmland and less oil and nuclear waste in the oceans would enable them to absorb more CO2. The fact that CO2 is a natural compound that is vital to life on planet earth, makes Bill Gates and his depopulation babble the most toxic element to life on the planet. Want less people? Adopt different reproduction policies like China did. Vaccinating people with poisons or spraying poisons on people, or feeding people GMO poisons without their knowledge or consent is not the way to go about it. There should be a bounty on Bill Gates head.
Posted 5/13/2013 10:09:11 AM
Anyone with the slightest bit of mathematical knowledge will look at Bill Gates equation and gasp without being distracted by all his blabber. To those of you who got lost in the blabber: People are one of the variables in the equation he wants to equal to zero! It doesn't matter how much you 'tweak' any of the other variables, zero = zero ! period.
Posted 1/19/2013 10:01:32 AM
For those of you claiming this is being misinterpreted; Did you watch to the video? He is clearly talking about a 10-15% decrease in population. He starts off with the 9 billion number. Then he talks about the ways to lower that.by 10-15%. Then concludes by saying we end up with an increase of 1.3. So let's do the math. From 6.8 billion to 9 billion is an increase of 2.2 billion people. If we decrease that by 10%(90,000,000) we end up with an increase of 1.3 billion instead of 2.2. Exactly what he says can be accomplished.
Posted 8/4/2012 1:00:18 PM
Oprah Winfrey strongly supported the candidacy of pro-abortion President Barack Obama and George Soros, and spent millions pushing pro-abortion groups and candidates. They all have a history of promoting abortion and using their vast fortunes to benefit groups like Planned Parenthood, the nation’s largest abortion business. Bill Gates’ father, William H. Gates Sr., has long been involved with the eugenics group Planned Parenthood, a rebranded organization birthed out of the American Eugenics Society. In a 2003 interview with PBS‘ Bill Moyers, Bill Gates admitted that his father used to be the head of Planned Parenthood, which was founded on the concept that most human beings are just “reckless breeders” and “human weeds” in need of culling. Read more at http://www.electronicrev.com/2012/08/exposed-secret-billionaires-club-and.html#zpwjLl4mlo4UhLBC.99
Posted 4/22/2012 3:44:07 AM
I never new that bill gates was a person of such a stupid logic. how come he compare the world CO2 emission with the individual emission per person at the grass root level. this is naive, he should rather mention extra emissions by waste companies like his useless corp. doing nothing better than the services developed on the laps of the peoples he is planning to kill. in the mean time people are always so i have to redefine his formula as CO2 = U x S x E x C/P where U= useless coprorations like Microsoft, S=service already available, not important E= energy to produce the service C=CO2 and heat emitted per their inefficient process P= people trying to save the planet
Posted 2/1/2012 8:49:45 PM
Bill Gates funds a number of programs - all "apparently" aimed at helping humanity and the global population through food, vaccines and healthcare. In reality, he works with Monsanto and Rockefeller - they have a seed collection that is pure and clean, all the while they are testing GMO's on the population, claiming it's the only way to sustain life on this planet. He's unleashed biotech mosquitoes to inoculate everyone against malaria. Thanks anyway Bill. If anyone truly believes Bill is out to help the planet, please, think again. It's a eugenics program. Do you think this multi-billionaire is vaccinated - and eats GMO food and factory farmed food? Oh, he also believes that solar radiation management is a good thing.... you know that aerosol spraying that blocks out the sun? Geoengineering or chemtrails.... call it what you want - he funds David Keith at the University of Calgary.
Posted 8/22/2011 2:37:00 PM
Hi, i have seen all the original video here http://www.ted.com/talks/bill_gates.html and what i got is that when he says "we could lower that" he is talking about the CO2, because the 70% of the video he talks about reducing it by using renewable energy!! He says that in the equation CO2=P x S x E x C if we wants to have CO2=0 one of these terms (PSEC) must be 0 so P is increasing, S increasing with the P, but we could lower E and C with renewable!! Mattia from Italy
Posted 7/18/2011 10:18:13 PM
I'm sure the negative comments only come from mr. gates' friends here. Don't let them discourage you, or maybe they didn't listen the part at 2:30 which clearly states he wants to drop population to at or near0 with vaccines, healthcare, etc. thanks your your dedication.
Posted 7/12/2011 1:37:41 AM
Proof that vaccines did not save us: See all Graphs http://genesgreenbook.com/content/proof-vaccines-didnt-save-us By genebean - Posted on 07 November 2009 History shows us that vaccines did NOT eradicate the diseases that plagued humanity. That is a common misconception -- in actual fact, it was better sanitation and hygiene in the cities that prevented the spread of diseases. These charts, from official sources, show us that vaccines (1) were not responsible, and are not necessary, for eliminating infectious diseases, (2) are not effective, and (3) are dangerous.
Posted 5/23/2011 9:20:42 AM
ChrisM. I totally agree with you. I'm finding alot of articles on this website are completely misguided, and fooling alot of people. I sent an email to the writers of this website and complained.Bill Gates is clearly talking about reducing CO2 levels, not population!
Posted 3/9/2011 3:41:14 PM
There are an awful lot of ostriches posting on here. Its clearly simple math, and the fact that he can stand in front of an audience of that size and clearly tell them that they are all planned to die and not immediately revolt is a testament to the evil at work here. Stick your head in the sand if you like, the fact is you can't do anything to stop it anyway. This is a plan made by the most powerful people on the planet for the benefit of the same, to them we are all "breathers and eaters" who exist to further there own lifestyle. Now that we are the cause of this problem its time to eliminate us. Like an infestation. There is only one way out and that is the oldest prophecy on Earth uttered in the Garden of Eden almost 6000 years ago.
Posted 3/5/2011 1:29:54 PM
Uncle Billy better, at least go back and finish his undergrad degree before commenting on this. Oh, wait ........... he already has BS ..... the the degree, but the other stuff. Asked 'the scientists' REALLY, really. What scientists. Population control? Anyone remember the predictions of Paul Ehrlich from the 70's?? Glad Billy isn't my uncle. And I'm guessing he won't offer to be one of the first in the de-population plan. Please, let's get back to the proper scientific method and away from pseudo-scientists and New Agers.
Posted 12/16/2010 10:30:08 AM
Mr. Adams, I'm a big fan of your site and advocacy, but I think your point here about Bill Gates is largely misguided and even irresponsible. To quote him as saying "if we do a really great job on new vaccines... we could lower [world population] by 10 or 15 percent" is to omit a few key words, thus taking his quote entirely out of context in a manner similar to the nonsense one finds on Fox news. Of course one could choose to interpret Gates the way that you have, but it seems to me that this would require that they have their own agenda and be looking for evidence that isn't necessarily even there. You decided to leave out "reproductive health" from the middle of that quote. Reproductive health could very well be referring to education on and the proliferation of condemns/ birth control. If this is the case then Gates would simply have been saying (and most likely was) that this could contribute to reducing population growth (and the transmission of deadly sexually tr
Posted 10/6/2010 2:27:22 PM
Global-warming? Come on, anyone who has actually done a serious review of the actual scientific research available, knows that most all empirical data available concerning global-warming (which is not skewed by various individual or environmental group's agendas) offers overwhelming support that the so-called global-warming belief, is a farce. Gates claims to have consulted top scientist. Hum, who are these so called, top people and why does he not cite them to at least give them credit for their research? Anyone can make this type of an outlandish claim. Plus, the CO2 formula that Gates speaks about was no doubt created by environmental extremists. These people claim to be "green," or desiring to promote energy and environmental conservation, but this formula is greatly lacking in facts. One fact for instance, is that it leaves out the entire animal kingdom, which contributes greatly to CO2 levels; which could add up to be even greater than that of us humans. To get CO2 levels to zero
Posted 10/6/2010 12:21:37 PM
It is a known fact that they have put sterilizing agents into vaccines of thirld world countries for a long time. They also add live disease causing viruses into vaccines. The healthcare system itself is already the third leading cause of death. Bringing down the population is a real factor in getting the co2 to Zero not just slowing the growth. If these people really wanted to bring co2 down to zero we would be using more solar, and other natural energy sources. The big companies don't want to let go of their profits so instead they turn the problem onto the people.
Posted 10/6/2010 11:31:45 AM
I must say, this has made me wonder what Mr Gates really meant to say. My girlfriend was just talking about getting her flue shot this morning, just hours after I watched this video. Perhaps, Mr. Gates can elaborate for us mere mortals?
Posted 10/5/2010 9:06:35 PM
I think we are interpreting the message differently than the speaker intended. It is part of being human that we have a tendency to reject anything that seems to harm human species. For a moment think it like a thinker, not an animal. Don't we make populating reduction laws in countries with large populations like China and India. I am from India, I've seen first hand that nobody even gives that a second thought. And here Bill is not even talking about reducing population; he mentions 1.3 billion growth, which is more than the total population just a few decades back. How vaccinations and better medical care for children reduces population is not by killing kids using thimerosal. It does so by giving a sort of assurance to the parents that their child will survive, so they don't have to bear 5-7 children just to be on the safe side if something happens to first two. I know this sounds weird, but that's the truth in developing countries that couples give birth to multiple children becau
Posted 10/2/2010 9:00:49 PM
Mr.Purnell, watch this again and again and read what Mike is saying. At first glance I agreed with you, Mike was over the top. Upon watching this again,I got chills as it sank in. Why do we need vaccines to LOWER the population? There is no stuttering. This is a bogus algebraic equation presented undoubtedly to a group sought out who they need to help pull off this plan. They are creating legions of unsuspecting worker bees to pull this off and i think Mike is right. It's right along side of all the other BS they feed us about unnatural food, pesticides, cancer treatments. Good eye spotting this Mike. Most people have been programmed (brainwashed) to such an extent about how "good" vaccines are they would totally miss exactly what he just said- that vaccines are part of the equation to reduce the popluation. It was very clear. And trees DO need CO2. We can't have ZERO CO2, the trees would die and so would our oxygen supply. Am I wrong? I'm certainly not a scientist but I think I learne
Posted 10/2/2010 5:02:00 AM
As a viewer, his words seem quite clear to me. Vaccines, health care and reproductive services could reduce the "P" factor. Simple as that. Therefore, it raises the questions on how safe are the vaccines, which we already know aren't, how save will heath care be through this reform, and we already know that reproductive services have historically murdered fetal humans. That is what "I" hear....No NET, MINUS. It was quite clear.
Posted 10/2/2010 4:31:58 AM
Mr Adams , you lose credibility when you deliberately distort information in this way. What a pity you are using your website to influence people with selective text
Posted 10/1/2010 9:45:05 PM
With all due respect DavidRPurnell.. It's not like he came out to correct his "Misstatement". The way it was said sounded like he meant to say exactly that.
Posted 10/1/2010 3:33:58 PM
If you didn't mind the co2, you could cut down every tree on the planet and still have more than enough oxygen being produced by the oceans to sustain life.
Posted 10/1/2010 1:44:29 PM
Mike, I couldn't agree with DavidRPurnell more.... I too respect and follow your articles daily; however, I think you missed the mark here Mike. It looks like you misunderstood what Mr. Gates was saying here!
Posted 10/1/2010 11:15:30 AM
To Mike Adams (founder, NaturalNews.com): I respect the excellent information you provide in NaturalNews (I'm a subscriber to the daily newsletter) . . . BUT, I think you're barking up the wrong tree . . . in reading too much into Bill Gates' VERY POORLY WORDED statement. I suspect that what he meant is that the NET EFFECT of the efforts of reproductive health services (to reduce births) MINUS the effect of vaccines and health care (to save lives) would lower the world's population by only 10 or 15 percent. I realize that's not what he said. But to believe your line of thinking on this matter requires buying into World Depopulation Conspiracy theory. I haven't bought into that yet . . . but, in view of world history . . . I have to admit -- it's not inconceivable. -David Purnell (Minnesota)
Posted 10/1/2010 7:29:00 AM
What are this people thinking about....Doesn't the trees need carbon monoxide to survive?....Don't they turn it into oxygen?...We don't need to kill anyone to make the monoxide go down in number what we need to do its to stop the dis forestation and start planting new trees. Also spend more money in alternative energy stop using petroleum.

Related Videos

Bill Gates declares this will be the decade of vaccines
Uploaded: 10/6/2010 1:33:27 PM
By University
Charlie Rose - An Exclusive Hour with Warren Buffett and Bill and Melinda Gates
Uploaded: 5/20/2011 3:33:55 AM
By SimisMisis
Get your Microchip to protect your health - Brainwashing TV Advert
Uploaded: 10/28/2010 9:47:12 AM
By University
Bill Gates on energy: Innovating to zero! | High-res video
Uploaded: 5/3/2011 11:59:37 AM
By SimisMisis
The Dangers of Vaccines (Autism SIDS MMR HPV Vaccination Gardasil Cervarix Thimerosal)
Uploaded: 5/31/2011 4:55:36 AM
By Ranger7
Bill Gates is Funding GMO Food - giving billions to the biotech industry
Uploaded: 10/8/2010 1:38:33 PM
By University
$$ It's All A Dream $$
Uploaded: 2/22/2011 9:42:52 AM
By DianeDi
Dr. Gary Null - Vaccine Hearing Part 3 of 3
Uploaded: 8/2/2010 9:32:59 AM
By DianeDi
Dr. Gary Null - Vaccine Hearing Part 2 of 3
Uploaded: 8/2/2010 9:48:41 AM
By DianeDi
Dr. Gary Null - Vaccine Hearing Part 1 of 3
Uploaded: 8/2/2010 9:56:34 AM
By DianeDi
The Dangers of MSG - Part 4 'Avoiding the MSG Threat' (Flavor Enhancers, E621)
Uploaded: 9/21/2010 4:56:57 AM
By Ranger7
The Dangers of MSG - Part 3 'MSG, Cancer & Your Heart' (Flavor Enhancers, E621)
Uploaded: 9/21/2010 5:25:52 AM
By Ranger7

Related NaturalNews Articles

CDC Vaccine Advisor Pockets $29 Million Promoting Vaccines

Watch Out for Flying Syringes, GMO Food Vaccines, and Forced Vaccinations

Infant Primate Study Links Vaccination with Autism

Historical facts about the dangers (and failures) of vaccines

Urgent lawsuit filed against FDA to halt swine flu vaccines; claims FDA violated federal law

Advertise with NaturalNews...

Support NaturalNews Sponsors:

Advertise with NaturalNews...

Copyright © 2013 TV.NaturalNews.com All Rights Reserved | About Us | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Featured Sponsors | Sponsorship Information

All content and video are property of their respective owners and have been displayed with their permission.
If you feel a video has been unlawfully uploaded, please report this abuse to us.