|   Already Have an Account? - Sign In   |   Help
ECOSCIENCE book (1977)
(2855 views) Uploaded 6/21/2011 3:01:47 PM by SimisMisis   (334 videos)   |  Learn more at: http://www.newsofinterest.tv/politics/eugenics/prisionplanet_holdren_intro.php

Info Comments (0)  

Video Information

Share
President Obama’s top science and technology advisor John P. Holdren co-authored a 1977 book ECOSCIENCE in which he advocated the formation of a “planetary regime” that would use a “global police force” to enforce totalitarian measures of population control, including forced abortions, mass sterilization programs conducted via the food and water supply, as well as mandatory bodily implants that would prevent couples from having children.
This article has been reprinted as part of a larger summary article A Summary of Long Term “Neocon Globalist” Agendas of the Global Elite. Text of this article has been hilighted by News of Interest.TV.


Obama Science Advisor Called For “Planetary Regime” To Enforce Totalitarian Population Control Measures

by Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com

July 11, 2009


Barack Obama's top science czar John P. Holdren

President Obama’s top science and technology advisor John P. Holdren co-authored a 1977 book in which he advocated the formation of a “planetary regime” that would use a “global police force” to enforce totalitarian measures of population control, including forced abortions, mass sterilization programs conducted via the food and water supply, as well as mandatory bodily implants that would prevent couples from having children.

The concepts outlined in Holdren’s 1977 book Ecoscience, which he co-authored with close colleagues Paul Ehrlich and Anne Ehrlich, were so shocking that a February 2009 Front Page Magazine story on the subject was largely dismissed as being outlandish because people couldn’t bring themselves to believe that it could be true.

It was only when another Internet blog obtained the book and posted screenshots that the awful truth about what Holdren had actually committed to paper actually began to sink in.

This issue is more prescient than ever because Holdren and his colleagues are now at the forefront of efforts to combat “climate change” through similarly insane programs focused around geoengineering the planet. As we reported in April, Holdren recently advocated “Large-scale geoengineering projects designed to cool the Earth,” such as “shooting pollution particles into the upper atmosphere to reflect the sun’s rays,” which many have pointed out is already occurring via chemtrails.

Ecoscience discusses a number of ways in which the global population could be reduced to combat what the authors see as mankind’s greatest threat - overpopulation. In each case, the proposals are couched in sober academic rhetoric, but the horrifying foundation of what Holdren and his co-authors are advocating is clear. These proposals include:


- Forcibly and unknowingly sterilizing the entire population by adding infertility drugs to the nation’s water and food supply.

- Legalizing “compulsory abortions,” ie forced abortions carried out against the will of the pregnant women, as is common place in Communist China where women who have already had one child and refuse to abort the second are kidnapped off the street by the authorities before a procedure is carried out to forcibly abort the baby.

- Babies who are born out of wedlock or to teenage mothers to be forcibly taken away from their mother by the government and put up for adoption. Another proposed measure would force single mothers to demonstrate to the government that they can care for the child, effectively introducing licensing to have children.

- Implementing a system of “involuntary birth control,” where both men and women would be mandated to have an infertility device implanted into their body at puberty and only have it removed temporarily if they received permission from the government to have a baby.

- Permanently sterilizing people who the authorities deem have already had too many children or who have contributed to “general social deterioration”.

- Formally passing a law that criminalizes having more than two children, similar to the one child policy in Communist China.

- This would all be overseen by a transnational and centralized “planetary regime” that would utilize a “global police force” to enforce the measures outlined above. The “planetary regime” would also have the power to determine population levels for every country in the world.




The government textbook co-authored by John Holden advocating totalitarian measures of population control.

The quotes from the book are included below. We also include comments by theauthor of the blog who provided the screenshots of the relevant passages. Screenshots of the relevant pages and the quotes in their full context are provided at the end of the excerpts. The quotes from the book appear as text indents and in bold. The quotes from the author of the blog are italicized.


Page 837: Compulsory abortions would be legal

“Indeed, it has been concluded that compulsory population-control laws, even including laws requiring compulsory abortion, could be sustained under the existing Constitution if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society.”

As noted in the FrontPage article cited above, Holdren “hides behind the passive voice” in this passage, by saying “it has been concluded.” Really? By whom? By the authors of the book, that’s whom. What Holdren’s really saying here is, “I have determined that there’s nothing unconstitutional about laws which would force women to abort their babies.” And as we will see later, although Holdren bemoans the fact that most people think there’s no need for such laws, he and his co-authors believe that the population crisis is so severe that the time has indeed come for “compulsory population-control laws.” In fact, they spend the entire book arguing that “the population crisis” has already become “sufficiently severe to endanger the society.”



Page 786: Single mothers should have their babies taken away by the government; or they could be forced to have abortions

“One way to carry out this disapproval might be to insist that all illegitimate babies be put up for adoption—especially those born to minors, who generally are not capable of caring properly for a child alone. If a single mother really wished to keep her baby, she might be obliged to go through adoption proceedings and demonstrate her ability to support and care for it. Adoption proceedings probably should remain more difficult for single people than for married couples, in recognition of the relative difficulty of raising children alone. It would even be possible to require pregnant single women to marry or have abortions, perhaps as an alternative to placement for adoption, depending on the society.”

Holdren and his co-authors once again speculate about unbelievably draconian solutions to what they feel is an overpopulation crisis. But what’s especially disturbing is not that Holdren has merely made these proposals — wrenching babies from their mothers’ arms and giving them away; compelling single mothers to prove in court that they would be good parents; and forcing women to have abortions, whether they wanted to or not — but that he does so in such a dispassionate, bureaucratic way. Don’t be fooled by the innocuous and “level-headed” tone he takes: the proposals are nightmarish, however euphemistically they are expressed.

Holdren seems to have no grasp of the emotional bond between mother and child, and the soul-crushing trauma many women have felt throughout history when their babies were taken away from them involuntarily.

This kind of clinical, almost robotic discussion of laws that would affect millions of people at the most personal possible level is deeply unsettling, and the kind of attitude that gives scientists a bad name. I’m reminded of the phrase “banality of evil.”

Not that it matters, but I myself am “pro-choice” — i.e. I think that abortion should not be illegal. But that doesn’t mean I’m pro-abortion — I don’t particularly like abortions, but I do believe women should be allowed the choice to have them. But John Holdren here proposes to take away that choice — to force women to have abortions. One doesn’t need to be a “pro-life” activist to see the horror of this proposal — people on all sides of the political spectrum should be outraged. My objection to forced abortion is not so much to protect the embryo, but rather to protect the mother from undergoing a medical procedure against her will. And not just any medical procedure, but one which she herself (regardless of my views) may find particularly immoral or traumatic.

There’s a bumper sticker that’s popular in liberal areas which says: “Against abortion? Then don’t have one.” Well, John Holdren wants to MAKE you have one, whether you’re against it or not.



Page 787-8: Mass sterilization of humans though drugs in the water supply is OK as long as it doesn’t harm livestock

“Adding a sterilant to drinking water or staple foods is a suggestion that seems to horrify people more than most proposals for involuntary fertility control. Indeed, this would pose some very difficult political, legal, and social questions, to say nothing of the technical problems. No such sterilant exists today, nor does one appear to be under development. To be acceptable, such a substance would have to meet some rather stiff requirements: it must be uniformly effective, despite widely varying doses received by individuals, and despite varying degrees of fertility and sensitivity among individuals; it must be free of dangerous or unpleasant side effects; and it must have no effect on members of the opposite sex, children, old people, pets, or livestock.”

OK, John, now you’re really starting to scare me. Putting sterilants in the water supply? While you correctly surmise that this suggestion “seems to horrify people more than most proposals,” you apparently are not among those people it horrifies. Because in your extensive list of problems with this p

Learn more at: http://www.newsofinterest.tv/politics/eugenics/prisionplanet_holdren_intro.php

Video Keywords: science    control        obama    totalitarian    book    to    population    for    advisor    called    planetary    regime    enforce    measures    ecoscience   

Rate This Video:  1 ratings

  

You must be signed in to use this feature.
Once you're signed in you'll be able to email videos to people, post comments, upload your own videos and much more.

 

Share this video on your site or blog. Just copy & paste one of the following:
Embeded Video Player (640x360):
Embeded Video Player (480x270):
Embeded Video Player (320x180):
Thumbnail Image Link:
Text Link:
Is there something wrong with this video or viewer comment? Please let us know:
Please describe the issue:
We would really appreciate you entering your email address so we can
response to you, but it is not required

Email:
Captcha Code:
Please enter the code displayed below
 

Viewer Comments (0 total)

Be the first to comment on this video.

You must be signed in to post comments.
Once you're signed in you'll be able to email videos to people, post comments, upload your own videos and much more.

 

Related Videos

NUCLEAR EVENT at Fort Calhoun in Blair, Neb. - Severe Flooding in Iowa, Missouri, and Nebraska
Uploaded: 6/21/2011 11:31:40 AM
By SimisMisis
Know Your Mushrooms
Uploaded: 8/30/2011 1:09:55 AM
By SimisMisis
Free electricity. Nikola Tesla - 2012
Uploaded: 3/22/2012 5:27:36 AM
By SimisMisis
Fibromyalgia Food Additives - 2
Uploaded: 3/17/2012 4:26:02 AM
By SimisMisis
Fibromyalgia Food Additives - 3
Uploaded: 3/17/2012 4:32:26 AM
By SimisMisis
The nuclear future of Switzerland
Uploaded: 3/5/2012 1:18:44 AM
By SimisMisis
Consuming Kids - The Commercialization of Childhood part 1 of 2
Uploaded: 4/1/2012 6:43:19 AM
By ricci1003
Consuming Kids - The Commercialization of Childhood part 2 of 2
Uploaded: 4/1/2012 7:00:05 AM
By ricci1003
Why Chemtrail / Geoengineering and Weather Control -Trailer
Uploaded: 2/20/2012 5:44:34 PM
By SimisMisis
Safety and Privacy Hovers Over Drone Debate | FAA writing rules for umanned vehicle flight in US airspace
Uploaded: 2/26/2012 12:57:51 PM
By SimisMisis
Michigan Woman Faces 93-Days in Jail For Planting Vegetable Garden
Uploaded: 7/9/2011 3:45:00 PM
By SimisMisis
Wikileaks
Uploaded: 9/30/2011 10:35:24 PM
By SimisMisis

Related NaturalNews Articles

Medicine's assault on calcium: Quack science fuels calcium bashing frenzy

Tabletop fusion breakthroughs are too hot for ideologically entrenched scientists

Passive TV viewing related to children's sleeping difficulties (press release)

Overweight people now outnumber the starving

Doctors Beat Cancer with Organic Science (press release)

Advertise with NaturalNews...

Support NaturalNews Sponsors:

Advertise with NaturalNews...

Copyright © 2013 TV.NaturalNews.com All Rights Reserved | About Us | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Featured Sponsors | Sponsorship Information

All content and video are property of their respective owners and have been displayed with their permission.
If you feel a video has been unlawfully uploaded, please report this abuse to us.